<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Can the Church Bridge the Generation Gap Through the Use of New Technology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anwoth.org/2010/01/18/how-can-the-church-bridge-the-generation-gap-through-the-use-of-new-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anwoth.org/2010/01/18/how-can-the-church-bridge-the-generation-gap-through-the-use-of-new-technology/</link>
	<description>&#34;O thirsty love, wilt thou set Christ, the well of life, to thy head, and drink thy fill?&#34;  Samuel Rutherford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.anwoth.org/2010/01/18/how-can-the-church-bridge-the-generation-gap-through-the-use-of-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwoth.org/?p=1756#comment-994</guid>
		<description>Well, Ben, you&#039;re most likely right that the 20% statistic there is much lower than the truth. But then again, that would be the one question I would not be surprised to see incorrect.

People have little reason to lie about whether they &quot;visited a church website.&quot; On the other hand, they are probably not going to freely admit to a stranger on the phone that they&#039;ve viewed online porn.

Don&#039;t throw out the whole study as &quot;bogus&quot; because of that discrepancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Ben, you&#8217;re most likely right that the 20% statistic there is much lower than the truth. But then again, that would be the one question I would not be surprised to see incorrect.</p>
<p>People have little reason to lie about whether they &#8220;visited a church website.&#8221; On the other hand, they are probably not going to freely admit to a stranger on the phone that they&#8217;ve viewed online porn.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t throw out the whole study as &#8220;bogus&#8221; because of that discrepancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Mordecai</title>
		<link>http://www.anwoth.org/2010/01/18/how-can-the-church-bridge-the-generation-gap-through-the-use-of-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Mordecai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwoth.org/?p=1756#comment-993</guid>
		<description>This study must be bogus. Less than 20% of users from any age group have viewed online porn? No way. Absolutely no way that is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study must be bogus. Less than 20% of users from any age group have viewed online porn? No way. Absolutely no way that is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
